Clusterpuck Test Table: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Switchnand (talk | contribs) |
Switchnand (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:testtable.jpg|thumb|alt=test table|The hackable table]] | [[File:testtable.jpg|thumb|alt=test table|The hackable table]] | ||
==January | ==Table details== | ||
*There are presently ~0.040" ID holes on a 1" rectangular pitch. They pass through a ~1/8" tileboard. | |||
*The area over which those holes are spread is roughly 33" x 61". | |||
*The plenum is presently ~0.5" open, though there may be a wider area across the middle. Not sure. | |||
[[File:airhockeyfan.jpg|thumb|alt=airhockeyfan|Fan that was on the air-hockey table when purchased]] | |||
*The stock driving fan, which was, I guess, adequate for the stock puck, is 4.5" across the blades. | |||
==January 22nd 2013 session== | |||
Some hacking was done on the Craigslist air hockey table on January 22nd 2013: | Some hacking was done on the Craigslist air hockey table on January 22nd 2013: | ||
| Line 12: | Line 20: | ||
[[File:octopucky.jpg|thumb|alt=octopucky|The incredibly heavy and dangerous "OctoPucky"]] | [[File:octopucky.jpg|thumb|alt=octopucky|The incredibly heavy and dangerous "OctoPucky"]] | ||
*'''Tested a printed puck'''. 3D printed a puck containing a ring of eight of those same NdFeB magnets ([http://www.makersite.com/blog/2013/1/23/clusterpuck-puck-prototype-1-magnet8 See blog post]). | *'''Tested a printed puck'''. 3D printed a puck containing a ring of eight of those same NdFeB magnets ([http://www.makersite.com/blog/2013/1/23/clusterpuck-puck-prototype-1-magnet8 See blog post]). | ||
** | **''Result 1:'' Turns out there's a reason air hockey pucks are normally quite light! Not only is it hard to get it to float (until you hook up the megablower, that is), but also: At these speeds it's quite frightening to have the puck be so heavy! | ||
** | **''Result 2:'' the behavior around the hidden magnet under the table surface was definitely even whackier. But maybe not whacky enough to justify the near-certain bodily harm that will result if we persist in using so heavy a puck. | ||
Latest revision as of 18:31, 5 February 2013
Table details
- There are presently ~0.040" ID holes on a 1" rectangular pitch. They pass through a ~1/8" tileboard.
- The area over which those holes are spread is roughly 33" x 61".
- The plenum is presently ~0.5" open, though there may be a wider area across the middle. Not sure.
- The stock driving fan, which was, I guess, adequate for the stock puck, is 4.5" across the blades.
January 22nd 2013 session
Some hacking was done on the Craigslist air hockey table on January 22nd 2013:
- Increased the airflow. Tried adding "just a bit more air" by replacing the 4" PC case fan... with a 2HP blower! Result: near-catastrophically inflated table, with surface bowing up at least an inch in the middle. Wooops...
- Figured out the workings. Dissected one corner to learn more about the plenum structure. Result: BUGS! Well, as far as we know only the two stinkbugs hiding in there. But where there are two... hmm. Other result: the plenum is actually very thin, just a ~5/8" sandwich of tileboard top, air gap bounded by particle board, and masonite bottom. The holes are a ~0.040" diameter, and on a ~1" grid.
- Tested the magnetic deflection concept. Taped a 0.5" diameter, 0.1" thick NdFeB magnet under the top surface. Taped another magnet onto the top of a puck, poles facing (for repulsion). Result: whacky puck behavior! Sometimes rapid invisible-cause ricochets, sometimes complete flippings. We're definitely working in the right direction here! So much fun.
- Tested a printed puck. 3D printed a puck containing a ring of eight of those same NdFeB magnets (See blog post).
- Result 1: Turns out there's a reason air hockey pucks are normally quite light! Not only is it hard to get it to float (until you hook up the megablower, that is), but also: At these speeds it's quite frightening to have the puck be so heavy!
- Result 2: the behavior around the hidden magnet under the table surface was definitely even whackier. But maybe not whacky enough to justify the near-certain bodily harm that will result if we persist in using so heavy a puck.